Buy answer
Topic: Annual Reports Review
Subject: Business and Management
Paper type: Research Paper
Style: APA
Cost: $10
Number of soruces: 2
Language: English (U.S.)

Question

Week 4 - Assignment

Annual Report Formats

[WLO: 3] [CLOs: 1, 3, 5]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 10Chapter 11, and Chapter 13 from your textbook; review the website AnnualReports.com (Links to an external site.); and review the Week 4 Weekly Lecture.

Go to AnnualReports.com (Links to an external site.) and review the annual reports recently released by two corporations in the same industry. Review each report and discuss the issues listed below.

It is strongly encouraged that you receive feedback on your paper using the Ashford Writing Center Paper Review at least two days before it is due. Then implement the feedback into your paper before submitting it to Waypoint. For instructions on how to use this feature, please review the Ashford Writing Center Paper Review (Links to an external site.). Make sure you appropriately cite your sources from AnnualReports.com and include a minimum of two scholarly and/or credible sources from the library in addition to the course text.

In your paper,

·         Describe organizational differences that you see in how each corporation discusses its annual performance.

·         Explain how clearly the data is or is not presented for enabling shareholders to draw conclusions about how well the company performed.

·         Explain what goals, challenges, and plans top managers emphasize in their discussion of results.

·         Describe ways the format and organization of each report enhances or detracts from the information being presented.

The Annual Report Formats paper

·         Must two to three double-spaced in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)

·         Must include a separate title with the following:

o    Title of paper

o    Student’s name

o    Course name and number

o    Instructor’s name

o    Date submitted

For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).

·         Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.

·         Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

o    For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.

·         Must use at least two scholarly or credible sources in addition to the course text.

o    The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.

o    To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this Ashford University Library Quick ‘n’ Dirty (Links to an external site.) tutorial, which introduces the Ashford University Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

·         Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)

·         Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)  (Links to an external site.)for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Description:



Total Possible Score: 5.00

Describes Organizational Differences Hindering Each Corporation’s Annual Performance Discussion, and Explains How Clear Data Is Presented for Shareholders to Make Conclusions on How Well the Company Performed

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes organizational differences hindering each corporation’s annual performance discussion, and comprehensively explains how clear data is presented for shareholders to make conclusions on how well the company performed.

Proficient - Describes organizational differences hindering each corporation’s annual performance discussion, and explains how clear data is presented for shareholders to make conclusions on how well the company performed. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially describes organizational differences hindering each corporation’s annual performance discussion, and minimally explains how clear data is presented for shareholders to make conclusions on how well the company performed. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe organizational differences hindering each corporation’s annual performance discussion and explain how clear data is presented for shareholders to make conclusions on how well the company performed; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The description of organizational differences hindering each corporation’s annual performance discussion and explanation of how clear data is presented for shareholders to make conclusions on how well the company performed are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Explains Which Goals, Challenges, and Plans Managers Emphasize in the Discussion of Results, and Describes Ways the Format and Organization of Each Report Enhances or Detracts From the Information Presented

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains which goals, challenges, and plans managers emphasize in the discussion of results, and comprehensively describes ways the format and organization of each report enhances or detracts from the information presented.

Proficient - Explains which goals, challenges, and plans managers emphasize in the discussion of results, and describes ways the format and organization of each report enhances or detracts from the information presented. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially explains which goals, challenges, and plans managers emphasize in the discussion of results, and minimally describes ways the format and organization of each report enhances or detracts from the information presented. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain which goals, challenges, and plans managers emphasize in the discussion of results and describe ways the format and organization of each report enhances or detracts from the information presented; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The explanation of which goals, challenges, and plans managers emphasize in the discussion of results and description of ways the format and organization of each report enhances or detracts from the information presented are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Answer

Arla Foods begins with its vision statement, a table of contents and a sneak peek of the past years’ performance in pictorial form. It has a segment for the management review which contains messages from the Chairman of the Board of Directors and that of the CEO in addition to highlighting the business priorities for the past year. It also discusses its business strategy which describes its business model among other essential business strategies(Foods, 2018). It outlines its brands and commercial segments, governance, its responsibility and financial review providing the necessary financial metrics for the easy comprehension by the shareholders. ...
Buy answer